<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Corporate Marketing &amp; Development Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketingblog.solidcactus.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketingblog.solidcactus.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Troubled Waters for Sponsorships by scott.carey</title>
		<link>http://marketingblog.solidcactus.com/2009/02/troubled-waters-for-sponsorships/comment-page-1/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>scott.carey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingblog.solidcactus.com/?p=127#comment-511</guid>
		<description>Lets not forget about A-Rod

http://adage.com/article?article_id=134617</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets not forget about A-Rod</p>
<p><a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=134617" rel="nofollow">http://adage.com/article?article_id=134617</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Power of Customer Service Crappiness by Nick</title>
		<link>http://marketingblog.solidcactus.com/2008/12/the-power-of-customer-service-crappiness/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 20:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingblog.solidcactus.com/?p=83#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Customer Service for most businesses still yet has to catch in the social media world. The problem now is that most local businesses receive feedback from review sites like Yelp. However, very progressive customer service tools like getsatisfaction.com (corporate focused) and feedbackjar.com (local focused) are tackling this problem directly by allowing businesses and customers interact directly. 
For example, since you had a bad experience at those businesses, you would post a problem thread on their profile. The businesses can read what your problem and reply back to resolve the issue. Hence, from customer service crappiness to customer service finger licking good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Customer Service for most businesses still yet has to catch in the social media world. The problem now is that most local businesses receive feedback from review sites like Yelp. However, very progressive customer service tools like getsatisfaction.com (corporate focused) and feedbackjar.com (local focused) are tackling this problem directly by allowing businesses and customers interact directly.<br />
For example, since you had a bad experience at those businesses, you would post a problem thread on their profile. The businesses can read what your problem and reply back to resolve the issue. Hence, from customer service crappiness to customer service finger licking good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Marketing and the Economy Discussion by Jean Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://marketingblog.solidcactus.com/2008/10/marketing-and-the-economy-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingblog.solidcactus.com/?p=36#comment-18</guid>
		<description>John,

Thanks for the post! I've seen advertisers trying a variety of tactics. The biggest theme is "smart spending": they're willing to grow their marketing budget if they can see the results. 

No doubt some competitors will pull back on their marketing budgets, so it makes sense to at least hold the course with your own. If they drop off, that's more sales for you to scoop up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>Thanks for the post! I&#8217;ve seen advertisers trying a variety of tactics. The biggest theme is &#8220;smart spending&#8221;: they&#8217;re willing to grow their marketing budget if they can see the results. </p>
<p>No doubt some competitors will pull back on their marketing budgets, so it makes sense to at least hold the course with your own. If they drop off, that&#8217;s more sales for you to scoop up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Optimizing for loop in javascript by anonymous</title>
		<link>http://marketingblog.solidcactus.com/2008/10/optimizing-for-loop-in-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devblog.solidcactus.com/?p=26#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Also you fail to mention that reversing loops to use -- instead of ++ can double the speed.

See:
http://archive.devwebpro.com/devwebpro-39-20030514OptimizingJavaScriptforExecutionSpeed.html

Listing 10.10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also you fail to mention that reversing loops to use &#8212; instead of ++ can double the speed.</p>
<p>See:<br />
<a href="http://archive.devwebpro.com/devwebpro-39-20030514OptimizingJavaScriptforExecutionSpeed.html" rel="nofollow">http://archive.devwebpro.com/devwebpro-39-20030514OptimizingJavaScriptforExecutionSpeed.html</a></p>
<p>Listing 10.10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Optimizing for loop in javascript by anonymous</title>
		<link>http://marketingblog.solidcactus.com/2008/10/optimizing-for-loop-in-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devblog.solidcactus.com/?p=26#comment-20</guid>
		<description>You don't say why it's more optimized and that is much harder to skim.  Unless it is significantly faster which you haven't demonstrated, the amount of time it would take someone to understand and debug it at a simple glance is too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t say why it&#8217;s more optimized and that is much harder to skim.  Unless it is significantly faster which you haven&#8217;t demonstrated, the amount of time it would take someone to understand and debug it at a simple glance is too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
